Wednesday, 8 April 2020

After the lockdown: Need for a practical exit plan


Devendra Kothari, Ph.D
Population and Development Analyst
Forum for Population Action


You enter strong and you exist strong, you are going to be OK.
Chris Fareley,
American Actor


In the last post (Think before you do! A case study of managing Covid-19 in India)[1]  I discussed how India took the decision about imposing total lockdown to fight CORONA- 19.  This post suggests some points which can be considered while preparing an exit plan.

On March 24, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a 21-day nationwide lockdown in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It was in PM Modi’s style like hasty proclamation of Demonetization on November 8, 2016. This unprecedented lockdown imposed at 00.00 hr on March 25, 2020, gave 1370 millions of Indians less than four hours to prepare. 

The unplanned lockdowns have created economic havoc in the lives of the millions who are part of the informal sector – not just daily wagers, but also workers of the gig economy.[2] According to the Employment –unemployment  Survey, 2015-’16, over 80% of India’s workforce is employed in the informal sector. One-third is casual or daily workers.[3]

“The lack of clear risk communication from top leadership and mixed messages from across the system spooked the poorer migrants who chose to start uncertain journeys,” Kurian says. “The exodus of migrants may have spread out the virus far and wide, adding another layer to India’s problems.”[4]

Most experts agree that a lockdown in India is necessary to contain the spread of COVID-19, but it would have planned better. As India enters the final phase of lockdown which began a fortnight ago, hope to exist plan will be better.

What should be done?
After fourteen days into the nation-wide lockdown (March 24 to April 7, 2020),  India is still wondering about its impact on arresting the spread of COVID-19 and is bogged down by the enormity of the tasks ahead, a question is being asked almost everywhere: will the lockdown, with its huge impact on the economy too, be withdrawn on April 15? Since the 21-day lockdown was announced on March 24 the number of COVID-19 positive cases in the country has risen from 600 on March 25 to over 4000 on April 7, and the number of deaths due to virus increased from 15 to more than 160. Thus, the number of positives cases increased around seven times in the first two weeks of lockdown. It means the community transmission stage is ‘inevitable’. Further, we cannot neglect the economy. Thus, the number of positive cases increased around seven times in the first two weeks of lockdown. Most of those who are badly affected by the lockdown belong to India’s massive informal economy, which employs about 424 million Indians, some 90% of the workforce, according to data from the Ministry of Finance, GOI. Construction workers, auto-rickshaw drivers, milkmen, vendors who sell vegetables and snacks from carts are all part of this economy; most live on daily wages, do not receive any benefits and work jobs that do not exist on paper.

Without entering into the debate, the need of the hour is to bring Coronavirus spread under total control.  No doubt, the dateline of ending announced 21 days lockdown is approaching fast. No one should be under the impression of the complete lifting of lockdown from April 15 onwards. India can expect a phased withdrawal of lockdown. How to implement it is a million-dollar question? For this, the following points may be of some help:
 
1. Follow Cluster approach: Whether India should re-impose total lockdown after the present one?  Consider the following facts: India’s current population is estimated at 1.37 billion with a population density of 425 persons per square kilometer in March 2020. Out of this around 350 million population was residing in large cities with 100,000 people and more. So far overwhelming cases of COVID-19 were reported from urban areas, especially from the large cities. It is, therefore, one has to identify clusters or hotspots. Every City Municipal Commissioner and the DM has all the information of clusters where the human density is large and crowded with filth and squalor. Immediate steps to isolate these areas should begin on a war footing.

After the 21-day lockdown is over, the infected clusters can continue with restrictions while other parts of the country/city should be allowed to return to normalcy. This will not only contain the virus in the hotspots but also allow economic recovery. Authorities have already started identifying such clusters across in UP, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Kerala, and Maharashtra. For example, a densely populated Ramganj area, a small community of Jaipur walled city, recorded the highest caseload anywhere in Rajasthan, and thus became the new epicenter of the outbreak in Rajasthan. Such hotspots need special attention. In the next few weeks, testing, tracing, isolation, and quarantine should be focussed on these hotspots.

2. Use minimum labor force and develop a new work culture: India needs to be in fighting mode until people get vaccinated while having minimal casualties. Govt. should come out with a disaster management plan for discussion in public well before the lockdown is lifted on 15th April. The endeavor should be to have a minimum workforce on the ground at a time. My view is that one-third of the workforce can perform all the activities of an organization or farm or mines. A rotation system may be developed, and work from home should be encouraged. All places of mass gathering and congregation may continue to remain shut for some more time.

3. Encourage communal harmony: After Markez incident, some politicians tried to make the corona pandemic as Hindu-Muslim issue.  If someone is disturbing the social harmony or creating obstacles against state efforts to control the virus, they must be immediately punished in public under the relevant sections of the IPC.

Here the role of free and impartial Media is important to fight COVID-19 in India. Imagine, for a movement, a raging pandemic in India without credible journalists to verify the facts, Rumors would become the only information available. Amidst the uncertainty, fear would grow. The panic in society that any government rightly fears, would be much worse without trusted facts to counter it; and that is happening in present India. "There should always be room for the argumentative Indian and not the intolerant Indian. The media must be the watchdog, the mediator between the leaders and the public," Indian President Pranab Mukherjee emphasized while delivering a seminal lecture honoring former press baron Ramnath Goenka some three years ago. His words are very timely in the face of the growing threat of the Corona pandemic.

In addition, as India has been battling the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, at the same time the government has to contend with growing communal polarization. It would be a significant move by GOI if all controversial issues like CAA, NPR and NCR are put in the cold storage for one year or so. And our PM Modi can take such a brave step in the national interest.

4. Enhance health spending: Doctors in hospitals across India said the lack of proper protective equipment available for medical staff, including basic masks, meant that patients presenting with coronavirus symptoms were being turned away. Doctors in Kolkata described how they were made to wear plastic raincoats to examine possible coronavirus patients, while a doctor in a Delhi hospital resorted to wearing a motorcycle helmet to cover his face. Further, India is not well equipped with testing. This is where much work is needed and India is behind. The number of tests performed has to escalate and the return of results has to be prompt. Private partnerships may be necessary to manufacture testing kits. One also needs to pay attention to disease surveillance, monitor respiratory illness cases across the country look at spikes in insurance claims due to such illnesses in the hotspot metro areas and watch out for emerging hotspots and outbreaks. We cannot fight this war blindfolded. For the future, set up disease surveillance, testing, contact tracing, create a high alert pandemic response team. We need to build public health forces and trained professionals across the country. Trust and invest in science. India has to increase the health budget.

India’s average expenditure on health is far below that of other developing countries, showing it to be a relatively low governmental priority. Health expenditure in India amounts to 3.7 percent of the GDP, of which only around a third is government expenditure. This is substantially below the low- and middle- income country average of 5.4 percent, of which nearly half comes from the government.

India’s public expenditure on health now stands at 1.28 percent of the GDP but even then, it is way lower than the average expenditure by countries clubbed as among the "poorest". More embarrassingly, the country’s public health expenditure is lower when compared with other South-East Asian countries like Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Thailand, and Bhutan. It is interesting to note that the government's own National Health Policy 2017 envisages increasing the health budget to 2.5 percent. We hope to see some action around this in the current situation.

5.  Strengthen Centre-State partnership: Finally, we have to recognize that Central government alone can’t fight corona alone. Close cooperation of states is urgently needed.  The constitutional vision envisages that both the central and the state governments must embrace a collaborative federal architecture by displaying harmonious coexistence and interdependence. This crisis is an extraordinary situation that required extraordinary coordination. It is, therefore, increased coordination between states and the Centre, and among political parties, it is essential.

Further, all states haven’t seen the same incidence of positive cases. Moreover, there are significant regional differences in economic structure. Therefore, it’s best if states are given leeway to tailor an exit plan according to the local context. “The exit strategy will influence both the economy and public health. It is essential to get it right.”

In sum, the success of Janata curfew’ demonstrated that people are willing to abide by government advisories and especially the appeal made by the Prime Minister. But a 21-day national lockdown on a four hours’ notice suddenly put millions of people at risk, leaving many struggling with basic requirements of food and medicines. They were left with a choice between the coronavirus infection and starvation. Hunger is the more desperate, deadly, and immediate of the two alternatives, and hence it prevailed. In the future, sufficient time should be given before taking such decisions.

 It is hoped that PM Modi will announce such an exit plan which will help to rid of coronavirus and push the economic revival.




[2] The gig economy is based on flexible, temporary, or freelance jobs, often involving connecting with clients or customers through an online platform. Further, the gig economy can benefit workers, businesses, and consumers by making work more adaptable to the needs of the moment and demand for flexible lifestyles. There is a wide range of positions that fall into the category of a gig. For example, adjunct and part-time professors are contracted employees as opposed to tenured or tenure-track professors. America is well on its way to establishing a gig economy, and estimates show as much as a third of the working population is already in some gig capacity. Read more at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gig-economy.asp

[3] Refer: Read more at: Report on Fifth Annual Employment - Unemployment Survey (2015-16).Read more at:  http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/content/442589/report-on-fifth-annual-employment-unemployment-survey-2015-16/


[4] Refer article:  Modi's Hasty Coronavirus Lockdown of India Leaves Many Fearful for What Comes Next by Abhishyant Kidnangoor, TIME Magazine, March 31, 2020. Read more at: https://time.com/5812394/india-coronavirus-lockdown-modi/



Tuesday, 31 March 2020

Think before you do! Proclamation of lockdown in India




Devendra Kothari, Ph.D
Population and Development Analyst
Forum for Population Action


“Don’t just jump into action just because people are taking action. Know and understand the next real action and reaction that will follow the action before you take any action.”



 Ernest Agyemang Yeboah

African thinker and author


The phrase “think before you do” encompasses much more than basic brain processing and is typically used to refer to think about the possible outcomes of a situation/decision and make the best choice about what to do. When one thinks before acting he/she must begin with the end in mind. Essentially, by thinking before acting, one plans what will happen next. Sure, the future is unpredictable but considering the circumstances, one may be able to make a fair guess about what action will give the most favorable results. Everyone or every nation has had that moment when the wrong thing was said or done and sets off a series of undesirable events. Unfortunately, India has    been in such a situation many times. 

Epidemiologic models show we need aggressive measures in the early phase of pandemic and measures like lockdown buys us time.  This post is a case study of an announcement of the Total Lockdown to control the spread of corona virus. The decision to impose a total lockdown was taken by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and it was welcomed by all. It, however, raises questions about the processes of decision-making in democratic India.


A Pneumonia of unknown cause detected in Wuhan, China was first reported to the WHO (World Health Organization) Country Office in China on 31 December 2019. The outbreak was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on 30 January 2020. On 11 February 2020, WHO announced a name for the new corona virus disease: COVID-19? It is the product of natural evolution, according to findings published in the in the journal Nature Medicine. However, it is difficult to say from where it came. It is said that it is a part of the biological warfare and it might have come from the Wuhan lab.

As of April 7, 2020, nearly 1300,000 COVID-19 cases have been documented in the world, although many more mild cases have likely gone undiagnosed. The virus has killed over 36,400 people, as per the bulletin of the WHO.

India reported its first three positive cases of COVID-19 in Kerala on January 31, 2020, all of whom were medical students who had returned from Wuhan - the epicenter of the disease outbreak. All these three have successfully recovered from the infection on February 14, 2020. The transmission, however, escalated in the month of March, after several cases were reported all over the country, most of which were linked to people with a travel history to affected countries. On 12 March, a 76-year-old man who had returned from Saudi Arabia became the first victim of the virus in the country. Confirmed cases crossed 100 on 15 March, 500 on 24 March, 1,000 on 28 March and 1,500 on 31 March.

So far no medicine or vaccine is available for its treatment except isolation. India has been very proactive and taken the right public health measures in terms of social distancing, and ensuring that the chance of an infected person meeting a susceptible person goes down with such interventions.

On 17 March, the GoI issued an advisory urging to all Indian states to take social distancing measures as a preventive strategy. On 22 March 2020, India observed a 14-hour voluntary public curfew or Janta curfew at the insistence of the PM Modi. The response was great.  Just after two days, on March 24, the prime minister ordered a nationwide lockdown for 21 days, affecting the entire 1.38 billion population of India.

Why 21 days? There are a scientific basis and epidemiological meaning for this number. Its calculations are based on the incubation period of the virus in a human host. The first 14 days are observed as the incubation period. The next 7 days are added for the residual infection to die out. Public health experts also say this is the most effective way of preventing the spread of the infection from those already infected into the community.  So, it was a decision based on solid ground.

It is too early to evaluate the decision of total lockdown since it was taken just seven days ago that is on March 24, 2020. Further, I agree with the Health Ministry Joint Secretary Lav Aggarwal that “this is not the time to do fault finding”. I wish to make it very clear that ‘social distancing’ is the only way to control the spread of the coronavirus at this stage.   However, for its better implementation, we must raise and analyse the issues faced so far. Also, this analysis may help to design an existing plan. This unprecedented lockdown imposed at 00.00 hr on March 25, 2020, gave 1370 millions of Indians less than four hours to prepare.[2]

In his address to the nation, he said “Forget about leaving home for the next 21 days. If you cross the threshold of your house, you will invite the virus home.” It has thrown much of the country into chaos.   Modi assured Indians that essential services would continue, but was vague regarding how people would be able to buy food and other necessary items. As a result, people rushed to shops to stock up before the decree took effect.

No doubt, under lockdown, well-off Indians isolated themselves in their houses, starting working from home, and started receiving groceries at home. But outside their windows, it was a different story. The lockdown has triggered a massive exodus of migrant laborers and daily wage workers from cities back to the rural villages they are from—where many won’t have to pay rent and food is cheaper. As a result, many people were seen defying the lockdown.   For example, with their livelihoods coming to a sudden halt after imposition of the countrywide lockdown on 25th March 2020, thousands of daily wage workers and labourers thronged the Delhi-Uttar Pradesh border, just after two days, in the hope of reaching their homes in far-flung areas, notwithstanding the threat of the spread of the coronavirus disease. Hordes of people, including women and children, with their bags on their heads and backs, waited in long queues to board buses at the Anand Vihar Interstate Bus Terminal, Dehli.  Such scenes were seen throughout the country. But there was no transportation. It is because public transport, including operation of private buses, taxis, auto-rickshaws, among others were suspended. Also, the movement of inter-state buses/trains/metro was suspended.

Due to such uncontrollable Jan sailab (uncontrolled crowd), the purpose of 'social distancing' was somewhat defeated. “Mass congregations like this carry the risk of spreading COVID-19 even further, says Oommen C. Kurian, head of the health initiative at the Observer Research Foundation, an independent think-tank based in New Delhi. He worries that migrants might carry the virus to rural areas, where health infrastructure is weak, or even non-existent.” [3]

Further, the governance was busy in looking after the welfare of migrant workers, their food, and shelter. As a result, in spite of the Home Ministry warning some 15 days ago the Nizamuddin Police Station, Dehli, just located just 50 meters from the mosque,  could not stop Markaz gathering of more than 4, 000 people. Most of these participants were from other countries, especially from Indonesia and Bangladesh.  And, the Markaz became the major cause of corona spread not only in the capital of the country but throughout the country. It was a total fault of the system failure, which was asked to look after the welfare of the migrant workers in place of maintaining law and order. And the country paid the heavy price of this action. [4] PM Modi later apologized for the hardships caused by the lockdown but said the measures were necessary.

India is a federal country. The total lockdown was a test of collaborative federalism, but India failed. Although initiatives have been announced by the central and many state governments to alleviate the suffering of the poor during the lockdown, this mass migration shows that the efforts of the central and the state governments have either not been orchestrated in sync or have not been implemented properly.

“Unfortunately, no sincere and strategic coordination between the Union and state governments were made to give full effect to the national lockdown and its possible implications on people’s lives. An inter-state coordination meeting of all chief ministers and Chief secretaries should have been called at an initial stage, ideally in the first week of March, to make a strategic plan on various preventive measures, including the national lockdown and its possible repercussions’, as noted by the Professor Law Singh and  his colleague Nayak at the National Law University, Odisha.[5]

In conclusion, the government’s intentions to impose lockdown may have been benevolent, but surely some thought should have been given by the top policymakers to how this decision will impact the bulk of its supposed beneficiaries. Could not special trains and even buses have been run to transport migrant labour, students, tourists among others home, before the lockdown?

The success of ‘Janata curfew’ demonstrated that people are willing to abide by government advisories and especially the appeal made by the Prime Minister. But a 21-day national lockdown on a four hours’ notice suddenly put millions of people at risk, leaving many struggling with basic requirements of food and medicines. They were left with a choice between the coronavirus infection and starvation. Hunger is the more desperate, deadly, and immediate of the two alternatives, and hence it prevailed. In the future, sufficient time should be given before taking such decisions.

We'll do less damage, to ourselves and others, if we think before doing. Henry Ford once said, “Thinking is the hardest work there is, which is probably the reason so few engage in it.” His statement may be true and why it seems that so many people don’t, but it really is not rocket science. If everyone just put a little bit of effort into thinking about what to do, the world could live in much more harmony, and the world would become a safer place to live. The law of life of thinking before acting is something that can have drastically different results. It can make us and the people that surround us happy or when ignored can greatly upset us. Whether we choose to pay attention to it or ignore it, this law of life can define who we are. So whenever you want to do something, take a step back to really think and ask yourself: should I, or should I not?  



[1] Refer: naturemdicine, Vol. 26(3), March 2020

[2] It was a hasty decision taken in the PM Modi’s style like his earlier proclamations. For example, he announced the Demonetization in a live national televised address at 20:15 IST on November 16, 2016.  He declared circulation of all ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes as invalid with effect from the midnight of the same day. Initially, the move received support from people. The move was, however, criticised as poorly planned and unfair.

[3] As quoted in Time’s article. Refer:  Modi's Hasty Coronavirus Lockdown of India Leaves Many Fearful for What Comes Next by Abhishyant Kidnangoor, TIME Magazine, March 31, 2020. Read more at: https://time.com/5812394/india-coronavirus-lockdown-modi/

[4] Delhi’s Markaz Tablighi Jamaat at Hazrat Nizamuddin has become India’s largest hotspot of Coronavirus - spreading it to  at least seven states. At least three central government departments were in the know of the event — including intelligence branches, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). 

Within Delhi, the Hazrat Nizamuddin Police Station is located right next to the Markaz mosque. It’s unlikely that the authorities were unaware of the situation developing right in their neighborhood.
Read more at:https://www.businessinsider.in/india/news/nizamuddin-coronavirus-hotspot-everyone-who-knew-about-the-religious-gathering-at-delhis-markaz-tablighi-jamaat/articleshow/74930784.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

[5] Refer article: Coronavirus: Test of collaborative federalism by Singh, YP and Ashirbad, Nayak at: https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/comment/coronavirus-test-of-collaborative-federalism-819841.html


Tuesday, 11 February 2020

$5 Trillion Dollar Economy through Human Development


Devendra Kothari, Ph.D
Population and Development Analyst
Forum for Population Action


Weak human capital prepares us badly for the economy of the future; and HDPlus strategy is the process of formation of human capital.


Soon after assuming office for the second term in May 2019, Prime Minister Narendra Modi aimed for a 5 trillion dollar economy by 2024. Earlier, speaking at the release of BJP election manifesto in April 2019, PM Modi said:  India should aspire to be a developed country by 2047, the 100th anniversary of its Independence”, and added that his government “will lay the foundation for this in the next five years” (2019-2024). Both goals are interrelated to make empowered India. 

No doubt, a five trillion dollar economy will make India a global economic powerhouse.  It will also help in alleviating poverty. "…our ambition to become economically strong has been driven more by our desire to become a less poorer nation,” finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman  said while delivering a lecture on 'Indian Economy: Challenges and Prospects' at prestigious Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs on  October 15, 2019.[1]

An increasing GDP (Gross Domestic Product) is often seen as a measure of development and economic success. The economy, according to Niti Aayog CEO Amitabh Kant, needs to “grow (at) 8 per cent-plus year after year to become a $5-trillion economy,” nearly double from its current $2.9 trillion. [2]  The pre-budget Economic Survey also said to reach the magic $5-trillion; India needs to “sustain a real GDP growth rate of 8 per cent”. But that possibility looks to have been kicked into the long grass with the Reserve Bank of India slashing its growth forecast for the financial year 2019-20 to 5 per cent or less from an earlier estimate of 6.1 per cent, citing weak domestic and internal demand.
So what India should do?  There is no secret that in the era of high economic growth, India’s growth is much skewed and its benefits go disproportionately to few people as gets manifested by Oxfam’s Wealth Report (2019) which points out that during last year, “wealth of top 1 percent in India increased by 39 percent whereas wealth of bottom 50 percent increased at a dismal 3 percent”. The concern raised by many experts is that the income inequality in India is rising much faster than expected.  The top one per cent richest individuals in India appropriated six per cent of total income in the early 1980s, and now, this figure has gone up to twenty two per cent.[3] This suggests that wealth is not trickling down to the poor and India is turning into a ‘republic of inequality’.

The results of the cross country analysis indicate that the level of productivity is negatively related to income inequality and that in turn pushes level of poverty.[4]  The Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), developed by the Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI) and UNDP, identifies how people are being left behind across three key dimensions: health, education and living standards, and 10 indicators – nutrition, child mortality, years of schooling, school attendance, sanitation, cooking fuel, drinking water, electricity, housing and assets.  According to the MIP report, [5] India has the highest multidimensional poverty after Afghanistan in South Asia. Nearly 54 per cent of the Indian population is multidimensional poor compared to 5 per cent in China.  There are more multidimensional poor people (421 million) in the eight poorest Indian states (Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal than in 26 poorest African nations combined (410 M). [6] It means around 700 million (70 crore) out of the total population of 1,370 in 2019 can be classified as deprived or vanchit Indians. [7]

And, there is no wonder that the World Bank ranked India at 115th out of 157 countries on the Human Capital Index in 2018. [8] HCI seeks to measure the amount of human capital that a child born today can expect to attain by the age of 18. According to its parameters a child born in India today will only be 44 per cent as productive as she could have been if she had enjoyed quality education and full health as well as better living environment including water and sanitation.  In other words, there are grave deficiencies in India’s human development inputs that are preventing children from reaching their full potential. As such, the productivity, measured as per capita GDP,   is very low. India became the fifth largest economy in the world in terms of GDP in 2018 but still it has a very-very low per capita GDP, as per IMF. It is placed at 119th position among 185 countries.

Delhi School of Economics professor Ram Singh says what help the economy could reach $5 trillion would be a near doubling of exports to $1 trillion annually. But that’s a big ask as India’s export performance has been normally weak. In fact, it is declining mainly due to the low level of labour productivity.

The goal of making India a USD 5 trillion economy by 2024 is difficult but not impossible.  So what India should be doing? The only way one can achieve the target by improving labour productivity or human capital. Several recent studies have found that the higher is income inequality within a country the more limited is the impact of growth on reducing poverty. A study conducted by the Centre for the Study of Living Standards, Canada uses several sources of international data on labour productivity, poverty and income inequality, and finds that across the developing countries for which data are available productivity growth plays a substantial role in reducing poverty. [9]  This conclusion suggests that developing countries like India, in attempting to reach their poverty reduction objectives, should pursue policies that foster productivity growth. However, a strong social safety net is also required to ensure that the adjustment costs that come with productivity increases do not fall disproportionately on the poor and that all members of society realize the gains from growth.

It is, therefore, an investment in people, especially who are deprived, is a need of the hour because only educated, skilled and healthy or empowered manpower can achieve the goal of 5 trillion dollar economy with inclusiveness.

How to empower people?
All people have the potential to succeed. Our job is to see the potential, find out what they lack to develop it, and equip them with what they need.  Here, the capability approach, which was conceived as an alternative approach to welfare economics by Amartya Sen and others, [10]  may be an effective strategy. It is an approach that is focused on people and their opportunities and choices.

The policy monograph - Nurturing Human Development: A Strategy for New India - [11]  proposes a strategy to unlock the human potential based on the capability approach; and it is christened as “HDPlus” (Human Development Plus).  It is a dynamic agenda based on a ‘whole child’ concept, that is school-going child and his/her family (that is HDPlus family) should be the fulcrum of human development efforts. The concept is being described by policies, practices, and relationships which ensure that each child is healthy, educated, engaged, supported and encouraged. For this, integrating the child and his or her family more deeply into the day-to-day life of school and home activities represents an untapped instrument for raising the overall achievements including learning skills and health parameters, and hence improving overall productivity. In other words, creating an enabling environment at family and school levels is a way to empower people. 

To start with, the HDPlus strategy focuses on five interventions in a more closely integrated form. They are: Improving quality of elementary education, Facilitating water and sanitation, Enhancing primary health, Reducing gender gap, and Stabilizing population. Additional interventions   may be added or given interventions could be dropped from the list   looking at the needs of specific people/area. Hence, the strategy has been termed as “HDPlus”.

Implementing Strategy:
The Nature of Mass Poverty” is a book by John Kenneth Galbraith, Harvard Professor of Economics. [12]  In this book, Prof. Galbraith argues that “to eliminate poverty, we must invest more than proportionately in the children of the poor community (families).”  Now the question arises how to identify the target population or HDPlus families? 

India is committed to compulsory free education for each child till the age of 14 years and so on. Almost all children go to the school. Therefore, the real problem is perhaps not with the question of access to education but rather it is about the quality of education being provided. In India, there are two types of schools – the government owned and aided ones, and the privately owned schools. The government schools are indeed doing a commendable job of making education available to a greater number of children since they are everywhere and   are normally doing it for free or for fees that are really within the reach of everyone. They are of great help for people in urban areas too for whom it is impossible to get their children to the more expensive private schools and in the rural areas; perhaps, they are the only ways in which children can get educated and dream of a better future. However, some teething problems do remain.[13]

Most government schools today, however, lack even the most basic requirements, such as class rooms, desks, drinking water, etc. There are no separate toilets for boys and girls. Broken window panes, furniture, fans and lights, paint and plaster peeling off the walls, leaky roofs, stinking toilets and garbage piled up in corners, children being taught sitting on the corridors due to lack of classrooms, etc. are a common sight in most government schools across the country. As such, Government schools in India mainly cater to the very poor section of the society. As per the Annual Economic Survey 2018, around 80 percent of students in the government primary/elementary schools are from the weaker sections of the society. [14] Based on the findings of National Achievement Survey 2017 (NAS) and Annual Status of Education Report 2017 (ASER), it has been found that “government schools have become the schools of OBCs, Dalits and Muslims as every child who can afford it has moved on to private schools.”  [15] The public elementary schools are, therefore, one of the most convenient institutions for reaching the target population – Deprived Household. 

After selecting students, the strategy will focus on their families and provide all basic needs for better living including water, toilet, electricity, cooking gas, primary health etc to promote human development. Further, efforts will be made that all students complete compulsory education. In addition, it will be assured that   they are well prepared to read, write and be efficient in mathematics & basic digital technology before moving to secondary   education, thus will be laying down the foundation of human capital formation, as shown below:

·         To start with, the focus of the HDPlus strategy will be on government-school-going children, aged 6 to 14 (that is I-VIII standards), and their families to be known as HDPlus families. An effort will be made to ensure total involvement of community/panchayat in the management of school.

·         The focal point of governmental pro-poor schemes along with HD interventions will be HDPlus families in order to create enabling environment for human development.

·         The strategy will be implemented by the government agencies with the help of grassroots workers in collaboration with civil societies. 

Conclusion:
India has to address root causes of poverty and inequality in order to empower people.  Persistent poverty and inequality is not just a violation of basic human rights of the people but it also undermines economic growth of a nation by wasting talents and human resources. It leads to a skewed society where power and decision-making remains in the hands of a few, leading to greater conflicts and undermining social cohesion. And that is happening in India.

The paper argues that there are grave deficiencies in human development endeavors in India   that are preventing  children from reaching their full potential, as noted by the Human Capital Index of the World Bank (Box A).  What should be done?  Commenting on the poor quality of human development, measured in terms of HDI, Bill Gates and Ratan Tata (2016) rightly noted:  “Human capital is one of India’s greatest assets. Yet, the world’s fastest growing economy hasn’t touched millions of Indian citizens at the bottom of the economic pyramid”.[16]  For this, India has to empower its people through a dedicated human development approach. For this, the paper suggests a workable framework – HDPlus - as how to invest in the people for enhancing productivity   in order to achieve the goal of developed country.

In sum, the HDPlus strategy, which aimed to lay foundation for the human competency, should be immediate priority of India.  It provides a workable process in achieving not only target of 5 trillion dollar economy but also making an empowered   India in a generation.



[3] Chancel, Lucas and Thomas Piketty. 2017.  “Indian income inequality, 1922-2014: From British Raj to Billionaire Raj?”  WID, World Working Paper Series No. 2017/11, World Inequality Lab, Paris School of Economics.  Also refer at: http://wid.world/document/chancelpiketty2017widworld/

[4] DiPietro, William R. 2014.  “Productivity Growth and Income Inequality,” Journal of Economics and Development Studies, Vol. 2 (3): 01-08.

[5]Refer OPHI Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2016 at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304077733_OPHI_Global_Multidimensional_Poverty_Index_2016


[7] India is the second most populated country of the world after China. Population of India is projected close to 1.37 billion or 1,369 millions in 2019, compare to 1.354 billion in 2018. Population growth rate for 2019 is projected at 1.08%. For details, refer at: http://statisticstimes.com/demographics/population-of-india.php

[8] Refer  2018 Human Development Index (HDI) at: https://www.onlinegk.com/news-and-tips/2018-human-development-index-(hdi)

[9] Centre for the Study of Living Standards. 2003.  Productivity Growth and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries, CSLS Research Reports 2003-06, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, Ottawa, Download at : http://www.csls.ca/reports/10-03-05_poverty.pdf

[10] Sen, Amartya. 1985. Commodities and capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Also refer: Nussbaum, Martha and Amartya Sen. 1993. The Quality of life, New York: Oxford University Press.
[11]For details, see:  Kothari, Devendra. 2019. Nurturing Human Development: A Strategy for New India, New Delhi: Paragoan International Publishers.

[12] Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1979. The Nature of Mass Poverty, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

[13] Kothari, Devendra. 2017. “Managing school education in India”, in Administrative Change, Vol. XLIV (2): 78-89.

[14] Economic Survey is an annual document of the Ministry of Finance, Government of India. It reviews the developments in the Indian economy over the previous 12 months, summarizes the performance on major development programs, and highlights the policy initiatives of the government. It also highlights the prospects of the economy in the short to medium term. Refer: Economic Survey of India, Vol. 2, at: https://insightgovtexam.com/economic-survey-2018-pdf-download/

[15] Refer National Achievement Survey(NAS) at: http://nas.schooleduinfo.in/

[16] Gates, Bill and Ratan Tata. 2016, “New nutrition report underscores the importance of leadership in addressing stunting in India”, Times of India. Refer  at: https://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toi-editorials/new-nutrition-report-underscores-the-importance-of-leadership-in-addressing-stunting-in-india