Tuesday, 28 February 2017

India: Human development and nutrition

Dr. Devendra Kothari
Population and Development Analyst
Forum for Population Action


India must convert its young population to a competitive advantage, and nutrition is one of the most important stimulants to that outcome.


Nutrition plays a critical role in human resource development since deficiencies in essential nutrients lead to malnutrition, which affects an individual's mental and physical state, resulting in poor health and poor work performance. In addition, a hungry, malnourished child may have mild to serious learning disabilities, resulting in poor school performance; a sick, poorly nourished individual will not respond well to treatment, could lose many working hours and may continue to drain family and national resources. Thus, malnutrition may undermine investments in education, health and other development sectors.

The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India has released the results from the first phase of the National Family Health Survey-4 (NFHS-4), conducted in 2015-16. The results indicate that fewer children are dying in infancy and early childhood. After the last round of National Family Health Survey in 2005-06, infant mortality has declined for which trend data are available. All States/Union Territories have rates below 51 deaths per 1,000 live births, although there are considerable variations. [1]

However, NFHS-4 reveals that India’s high economic growth rate in the past decade has not been fully reflected in the health status of its people with 20 per cent of its population undernourished. More than half of the children and women are still anaemic.

The “Global Nutrition Report 2016” collaborates the findings of the NFHS-4. It once again demonstrates India’s slow overall progress in addressing chronic malnutrition, manifest in stunting (low weight for age), wasting (low weight for height), micronutrient deficiencies and over-weight. “Our track record in reducing the proportion of undernourished children over the past decade has been modest at best, and lags what other countries with comparable socio-economic indicators have achieved”, as noted by  Vinita Bali, Director, Alliance for  Improved Nutrition.[2]

According to the Report, in a ranking of countries from lowest to highest on stunting, India ranks 114 out of 132 countries, with the incidence of stunting at 38.7 per cent, compared with Germany and Chile at 1.3 per cent and 1.8 per cent, respectively. Even Bangladesh and Nepal rank marginally higher than India. On wasting, India ranks 120 out of 130 countries, at 15.1 per cent, compared with Australia and Chile at number 1 and 2, with 0 per cent and 0.3 per cent, and South Sudan at 130 with 22.7 per cent. On the prevalence of anaemia in women of reproductive age, India ranks 170 out of 185 countries at 48.1 per cent, compared with Senegal which is the worst at 57.5 per cent and the U.S. which is the best at 11.9 per cent.

The segments most at risk continue to be adolescent girls, women and children, and among them Scheduled Castes and Tribes are the worst off, reflecting the insidious economic and socio cultural deprivation so prevalent in India. The most important national effort is yet to address these deficiencies in India.Despite being one of the biggest producers of food supplies, India is home to 25 percent of the world’s hungry poor, according to a U.N. agency.


The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) [3] makes the annual calculations of Global Hunger Index (GHI). Basing its readings on the most recent data, the 2016 GHI for India was derived from the fact that an estimated 15 per cent population is undernourished - lacking in adequate food intake, both in quantity and quality. the report states that “Countries worse than India include extremely poor African countries such as Niger, Chad, Ethiopia and Sierra Leone besides two of India's neighbors: Afghanistan and Pakistan. Other neighbors Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal and China are all ranked above India”.[4]

According to the Report that the malnutrition is a complex problem that contributes to 45 per cent of deaths among children under the age of five in India annuall. Chronically malnourished children are, on average, nearly 30 percent less literate than those who have a nutritious diet. The share of under-5 children who are `wasted' is about 15% while the share of children who are `stunted' is a staggering 39 percent. This reflects widespread and chronic lack of balanced food. This is partially reflecting the fatal synergy of inadequate nutrition and unhealthy environments.

Although India runs two of the world's biggest children's nutrition programmes, the ICDS for children under 6 years  (launched  in 1975) and the mid-day meal programme (1995) for school going kids up to the age of 14, malnutrition    continues to haunt India.

No doubt, nutrition is a big issue. Many health problems could be resolved by proper nutrition. For example, a tuberculosis control strategy that is merely treatment-based would be ineffective unless under-nutrition, which compromises immunity and leads to the latent TB infection turning active in millions, is addressed. Prof Anurag Bhargava, who has been working for decades on TB, pointed out that in India where 40 per cent of the population or about 500 million is estimated to have latent TB infection, it would be logistically impossible to treat them with drugs for 6-9 months. It is always malnutrition and vitamin deficiency that leads a person to TB. A body must have adequate vitamins, minerals and other natural substances in the food it takes to avoid TB. In other words, TB is a nutritional disease, argues Prof Bhargava, that can be prevented by placing nutrition (including adult nutrition) at the heart of the global developmental and public health agenda and implementing appropriate economic and agricultural policies, social protection measures and targeted nutritional interventions". [5]

One of the reasons for persistent under nutrition in India, despite the creation of the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) in 1975 and national coverage of the Mid-Day Meal Scheme in 1995, is that there is no structure for multi-sectoral coordination which is essential to address the inter-generational and multifaceted nature of malnutrition. Both schemes should be revamped looking to the needs of beneficiaries.[6]

Of these, the intent to revamp the ICDS has already been announced by the Government and must move into action mode quickly. This must include streamlining the work in the 1.34 million anganwadi centres by investing in training the 2.5 million workers and helpers at these centres, standardizing the nutrition component of the supplementary food offered and focusing on the overall dissemination of information and education to pregnant and nursing mothers on healthy eating habits, hygiene and sanitation,

Similarly, the mid-day meal is an excellent structure to reach 120 million children with continuity and regularity. A single intervention in that scheme to focus on nutrition in addition to food will make a critical difference. This can easily be accomplished by the addition of micronutrients to cooked food or by adding universally liked and accepted products such as milk, biscuits, etc. fortified with micronutrients as a mid-morning or afternoon snack. Therefore, extend large-scale food fortification beyond salt to other staples like flour, oil, dairy, etc. and establish mandatory standards by category.

In addition, endemic poverty coupled with growing number of unwanted childbearing,[7] unemployment, lack of sanitation and safe drinking water, and lack of effective healthcare are main factors for the sorry state.
The human dividend or demographic dividend on which we are banking is actually a huge liability given that one out of every three children is born underweight and unable to realize the full potential for physical growth and cognitive development, leading to lower levels of productivity. The World Bank estimates that India loses 2-3 per cent of its annual GDP by way of lower productivity, the underlying cause of which is malnutrition.

In sum, the need to systemically address underlying causes of malnutrition in India is an urgency that cannot be postponed. Poor nutrition will fracture the dreams and aspirations of India to become a global player in manufacturing and other sectors. Hope policy makers are listening!



[1] Refer: National Family Health Survey 2015-16 (NFHS-4): states fact sheets, International Institute of Population Studies, Mumbai, 2016.


[2] Refer article by Vinita Bali: We need a Nutrition Mission at: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/We-need-a-Nutrition-Mission/article14503108.ece

[3] The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) makes the annual calculations of GHI.

[4] For details, refer article at:, http://www.ifpri.org/news-release/india-ranked-97th-118-global-hunger-index-times-india. Also see: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-ranked-97th-of-118-in-global-hunger-index/articleshow/54822103.cms 

[5] Refer article: To control TB, under nutrition must be tackled’ by Rema Nagarajan (2016) at: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/To-control-TB-undernutrition-must-be-tackled/articleshow/55216307.cms

[6] For further  details, see article by Vinita Bali: We need a Nutrition Mission at: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/We-need-a-Nutrition-Mission/article14503108.ece

[7] Kothari, Devendra. 2014. “Managing Unwanted Fertility in India: Way Forward”, Institute of Economic Growth (ed.):   National Rural Health Mission: An Unfinished Agenda, New Delhi: Book Well, pp.25-36. Also refer, author’s post entitled - India: Why population matters? at http://kotharionindia.blogspot.in/2015/04/india-why-population-matters.html


Tuesday, 31 January 2017

Why American elected Trump as President of USA?

Dr. Devendra Kothari
Population and Development Analyst
Forum for Population Action

Donald Trump is not the only villain in the world. All of us are equally guilty

 

Donald J. Trump did what millions thought impossible: he is 45th President of United States of America. Here is why?


It was an astounding feat for Trump to get elected. He has never held public office. He is widely known for a unique form of unpleasant character and corrupt capitalism. On top of this, he was hugely unpopular, even more so, according to most polls, than his opponent. True, if the U.S. were like the rest of the world, the person who got the most votes—Hillary Clinton, with in this case around 3 million more—would be the next president. Thus, Trump starts his term having very little legitimacy in the eyes of millions. But this does not matter.

Eager to demonstrate his readiness to take actions, Trump went directly to the Oval Office just after taking oath and before the inaugural balls, and signed his first executive order as President   to "minimizing the economic burden" of President Obama’s Affordable Care Act. Trump said that “This is a movement and now the work begins," before dancing with his wife, Melania, to "My Way" at the first of three inaugural balls. It appears that he is going to have his “way” during his tenure.

So how the hell did this happen? The Trump victory, as unlikely and confounding as it was, set off an enormous amount of head-scratching, along with an unprecedented avalanche of opinions and theories about how this came to be. This post analyzes why Donald  Trump won?

Recently, a post appeared at AlterNet, the authors suggested a number of “theories” of this election. [1]  Before we dig deeper, we need to stipulate at the onset that there can be no one single theory explaining why voters favored him. And I have my own explanation.

I arrived in the San Francisco Area just one month before Donald Trump was nominated as the Republican Party candidate for the presidency at the Republican National Convention held in Cleveland, Ohio on July 18–21, 2016. But he was widely branded as a unique form of obnoxious character by media - both print and television. One of the most trusted popular newspapers – New York Times – openly opposed and criticized his candidature. Many experts and even big ones in the Republican Party issued statements after statements against Trump’s capabilities to run the country.

I was totally confused and shocked why people especially media were cursing him? If he was such an obnoxious character why the ordinary members of Republican Party, in first place, elected him as its candidate in primaries with a wide margin? My friends and even my own relatives in USA were against Donald Trump candidature.  And that motivated me to verify the facts. 

Americans are more divided nation along political lines. During my stay in USA during summer 2016, I talked to people of both sexes and found majority of my sample, though it was very-very small, favored change and they thought that Donald Trump like Narendra Modi in India in 2014 could be an agent of change. The majority of American both republican as well as a small number of democrats thought Donald Trump could be an Agent of Change. Hillary Clinton was very familiar but she was seen an extension of President Barak Obama.  Further, Clinton was tarnished by perceived corruption for accepting money from Wall Street for her speeches. In addition, Hillary’s email controversy further damaged her candidature.  Clinton also lacked a strong central message. Her general election campaign focused almost exclusively on Trump’s unfitness for office. It was a negative strategy.  

Also, Hillary Clinton’s candidacy had provoked a wave of misogyny. According to the Public Religion Research Institute, 52 percent of white men held a “very unfavorable” view of Clinton. It is ironic that in a country where women rights are far more progressive than many other countries, the United States was not yet ready for a woman president. Regardless of Trump’s derogatory remarks against women, a sizable number of women all over America voted for Trump in enough numbers to see him to victory (Refer: https://qz.com/832024/2016-presidential-election-results-hillary-clintons-loss-is-a-sign-that-america-was-never-ready-for-a-woman-president/) .

On the other hand, Trump was able to create an impression among people that a prosperous future was in store for the United States under his presidency.

Also, during my stay in the Bay Area, I spent a good amount of time at the book store Barnes & Noble and San Carlos Public Library. One book - The Price of Prosperity: Why Rich Nations Fail and How to Renew Them (2016) - impressed me a lot. And it helped me to my quest.

In this book, a former White House director of economic policy, Todd G. Buchholz,  exposes the economic, political, and cultural cracks that wealthy nations face and makes the case for transforming those same vulnerabilities into sources of strength—and the foundation of a national renewal.

Buchholz raises the question: Is the loss of empire inevitable? No. Can a community spirit be restored in the U.S.? According to him, the answer is a resounding yes. “We cannot retrieve the jobs of our grandparents, but we can embrace uniquely American traditions, while building new foundations for growth and change.” He offers a roadmap to recovery for USA and calls for a “revival of national pride and patriotism to help us come together once again to protect the nation and ensure our future”.

A sizable number of Americans, for a host of reasons, is feeling fundamental loss. Economic despair, lost jobs, fantasy-based economic policy, unwarranted involvement in Iran and Iraq and racism were too potent a cocktail for voters and that drove Donald Trump to victory. Voters took a risk, and that risk means white supremacists in the White House. It is widely felt that The US will be a minority-majority country by the middle of the century (that is whites will be less than 50% of the population), and  so a Trump is needed. 

At the same time, an average American could not understand why media including newspapers like The New York Times were apposing him totally. In the big picture, while the press wasn’t the only entity responsible for Trump’s win, it played a major role in making it happen.

And Donald Trump was smart enough to coin the slogans “Make America Great Again” and “America First”.  And that convinced the Americans that Donald Trump is a person who could solve their problems and ensure their future.

In Donald Trump win, one has to recognize that we live in a world where a political culture has become almost disconnected from truth that is “Post-Truth” politics. The term “Post-truth” is being defined as "a political culture in which politics (public opinion and media narratives) have become almost entirely disconnected from policy or truth. 

In other words, the Post-truth politics (also called post-factual politics) is a political culture in which debate is framed largely by appeals to emotion disconnected from the details of policy, and by the repeated assertion of talking points to which factual rebuttals are ignored. (In 2016, the term "post-truth" was chosen as the Oxford Dictionary’s Word of the Year due to its prevalence in the context of that year's Brexit and Donald Trump election.)

For much of the election season, candidate Trump was allowed to say whatever erroneous thing he wanted without correction, while the flagging media used the Trump show to drive ad dollars to levels the industry had not seen in years. Initially, Trump bathed in this spotlight, as per the Fox News.

The biggest explanation is that voters wanted to have drastic change, though many of the things Trump said were contradictory and often untrue, but that did not seem to matter to 60 million or so voters. But, why were they willing to bet the ranch on a candidate with some of the most blatant flaws and inappropriate behavior of any presidential candidate in our lifetime needs more research based explanations.

In sum, if our political leadership does not recognize the Post-truth politics we may have many Trumps in future. In this context we should not forget the rise of Hitler in thirties. Moral of the story:  the politicians must pay close attention to or give heed to the feeling of the ordinary people and mold accordingly.

Post scriptum:
Whether we like him or not, India and the rest of the world will eventually deal with President Trump, reservations and personal distaste about his policies and idiosyncrasies notwithstanding.

We have to recognize that Trump’s first interest is to protect America’s interest. And that is right. Nevertheless, India must prepare for a situation where there is a clampdown on US visas for Indian businesses, professionals and passport holders. And the government must spot opportunity in adversity, it should take advantage of any American ban to speed up the reform process and lure American companies to ‘Make in India’.  For this, we have to unlock the human potential as well as create favorable conditions of doing business (according to World Bank’s latest ease of doing business country rankings, India comes in 130th among 189 countries).


[1] This post is greatly influenced by an article - Why Donald Trump won — and how Hillary Clinton lost: 13 theories explain the stunning election by  DON HAZEN KALI HOLLOWAY JENNY PIERSON JAN FREL LES LEOPOLD STEVEN ROSENFELDMICHAEL ARRIA ILANA NOVICK  JANET ALLON ALTERNET. It was originally appeared on AlterNet.  For detail, refer at: http://www.salon.com/2016/12/26/13-theories-on-why-trump-won-and-how-clinton-lost_partner/


Saturday, 31 December 2016

India: Promoting healthy life for Human Development

Dr. Devendra Kothari
Population and Development Analyst
Forum for Population Action

Wishing you a Happy New Year

The positive health outcomes ultimately contribute to better educational outcomes and a more productive and higher-skilled labor force. India, therefore, must convert its young population to a competitive advantage, and general health, nutrition and children by choice are foundational to that outcome which promotes healthy life.

This post discusses the state of general health.

India’s current state of health is alarming. Recently, the world's most revered medical journal - The Lancet - has censured severely Government of India for ignoring health sector and has warned that India is on the “verge of a collapse under the weight of its own ill health”. In an exclusive interview to Times of India, Lancet's editor-in-chief Richard Horton said that failing to combat non communicable and communicable diseases will cost India's health system and social care "enormously making India collapse”. [1]

The World health organization has identified India as one of the nations that is going to have most of the lifestyle disorders in the near future. [2]  Nowadays, not only are lifestyle disorders becoming more common, but they are also affecting younger population. The population at risk shifts from 40+ to may be 30+ or even younger. Already considered the diabetes capital of the world, India now appears headed towards gaining another dubious distinction of becoming the lifestyle-related disease capital as well. These include obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and osteoporosis, among others.  A study conducted jointly by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences and Max Hospital shows the incidence of these diseases is increasing at an alarming rate, especially in the young population.

Modern science through improved sanitation, vaccination, and antibiotics, and medical attention has eliminated the threat of death from most infectious diseases. However, communicable diseases are still a major cause of deaths in India.

The  data, released by the office of the Census Commissioner, reveals that one in two deaths in the country, estimated in the period 2010-13, are due to non-communicable  or lifestyle diseases. However, for urban areas, NCDs account for nearly 60 per cent of deaths. Communicable diseases in the top 10 include lower respiratory tract diseases like bronchitis and pneumonia, diarrhea, TB and diseases occurring to prematurely born babies. Road injuries are the tenth most prevalent cause of death. Together, these 10 make up 60 per cent of the 10.3 million deaths in India every year. The top 10 causes of deaths in India have remained the same since 2004-06, with a slight change in order.

As such, one can draw the conclusion that India at present faces a combination of communicable diseases and non-communicable, with the burden of chronic diseases has exceeded that of communicable diseases. Projections nevertheless indicate that communicable diseases will still occupy a critically important position up to 2020.

India's position in the middle of the transition from a poor, healthcare-deficient country to an advanced country is brought out starkly when compared with examples from other countries. In Niger, one of the poorest countries in the world, with a per capita gross domestic product less than one-fifth of India's, eight of the top ten causes of death are communicable diseases. At the other extreme, Norway, with per capita gross domestic product over ten times that of India, has just one communicable disease — lower respiratory tract infections — among its top ten, with the other nine being non-communicable diseases.

China, which started off from conditions similar to India, has moved much further towards the advanced end of the transition. It too has only one infectious disease among its top ten causes of death.

These are disturbing statistics. India needs to dramatically improve the quality of life for its citizens in terms of cleaner environment; better citizen amenities and preventive healthcare measures to improve the health of people; and to bring under control the seasonal diseases like Chikungunya and Dengue, the dreaded vector-borne diseases, quickly and effectively. The prologue resultant debility is seriously affecting the productivity of the sufferers and thus, economics of their families and organizations. People of this country should not be made suffer every year when preventive measures are already known.

In addition to better sanitation and sports, yoga needs to be promoted as a non-sectarian wellness initiative to control communicable and non-communicable diseases. On the occasion of the second International Yoga Day, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has done well to highlight the non-sectarian character of yoga. Emphasizing that yoga was not religious in nature; he asserted that the traditional practice was even meant for atheists. Moreover, he described yoga as an instrument that provided health assurance with zero spending. A mass movement that promotes yoga can be one way of following the dictum that prevention of ill health is better than cure. Further, the Government of India must rethink about reintroducing The National Cadet Corps in all the   schools and colleges on the voluntary basis. 

Most of the challenges facing India’s health system can be attributed to under investment and the inefficient use of resources, as argued by Dr. Prabhat Jha of the Centre for Global Health Research, University of Toronto.   Further, the promise of universal health coverage will remain unfulfilled unless health is prioritized, as noted by Dr.  K. Srinath Reddy, President of the Public Health Foundation of India.  In addition, an inadequate number of doctors and a poor network of public hospitals, coupled with bureaucratic bungling, means India often struggles to spend even its allocated budgets. 

Asia's third-largest economy spends around 1 per cent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on public health, compared with 3 per cent in China and 8.3 per cent in the United States. (Indian states manage their health budgets separately.) As a result, the per capita spending rates are extremely low at US $ 109 (in Purchase Power Parity terms) as compared to the USA ($7,285) and Brazil ($837). The global figure is US$ 863 (WHO World Health Statistics 2010). As such, there is an urgent need to increase the budgetary allocation for health.

There is an urgent need to develop an effective healthcare delivery system, which addresses both communicable and non-communicable healthcare needs. For this, India needs to adopt an integrated national healthcare system built around a strong public-primary care system with a clearly articulated supportive role for the private and indigenous sectors. [3]

The draft National Health Policy 2015, which provides a broad roadmap for health system reforms, calls for strengthening primary care services to provide comprehensive care for several health conditions including non-communicable diseases.  Further, continuity of care would be ensured through linkages with secondary and tertiary care facilities. Both public and private sector providers would be engaged to deliver the service package, which would be paid for by the government-funded health insurance schemes, as noted by the draft NHP. 

In addition, there is an urgent need to enhance the standard of medical education/training in India. Medical education and its subsequent impact on medical care has been adversely affected by Medical Council of India (MCI), which regulates medical education and licenses doctors, MCI’s emphasis on infrastructure in colleges and not quality of students. Niti Aayog’s (formerly Planning Commission) draft legislation wants to replace the current system with a common entrance exam as well as a common exit test to make sure doctors meet minimum standards prior to practice. It is important to end the vested interest medical colleges have in churning out substandard doctors.

Furthermore, for India to be healthy, we have to focus on the nutrition.

The next post discusses the state of nutrition.




[1] Refer at: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Brtish-medical-journal-Lancet-to-take-Modi-to-task-for-ignoring-health-sector/articleshow/49484703.cms.


[2] Refer WHO at: http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/2_background/en/ 

[3] Refer author’s article: India needs efficient healthcare system for overall development at: http://kotharionindia.blogspot.in/2016/06/india-needs-efficient-healthcare-system.html


Wednesday, 30 November 2016

Changing the way India learns to unlock the human potential

Dr. Devendra Kothari
Population and Development Analyst
Forum for Population Action

The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled
Plutarch, a Greek thinker and essayist

Education is both a process and an outcome; it is the process of acquiring information, knowledge and skills; but it is also the ability to demonstrate the possession of such information, knowledge and skills so as to qualify to be referred to as educated individual or human capital. Therefore, within the term “education” is embedded the concept of productivity.[1]

There is a general belief that education leads to efficient work which in turn leads to social and economic development. There are roughly 450 million people in India that make up our work force. Of these, 90 percent have not completed school or higher education. Why? Because, of the 630,000 villages in India, over 500,000 don’t have schools that can provide education above Class VII.

Without a doubt, labour productivity is linked to education. Let us consider what is happening at the education front especially at the school education.  

India does well to keep ninety seven per cent of children between 6 and 14 years of age enrolled in schools and most of them are attending the school on a regular basis,  but the problem is now of quality, not quantity. More than half our school students are being classified as functionally uneducated and unskilled or simply half educated. NGO Pratham’s 10th Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2014, based on the survey in 577 districts and 16,497 villages covering 3,41,070 households and about 5,69,229 children in the age group 3-16 ,  noted that overall situation with basic reading and arithmetic continue to be extremely disheartening in India. According to ASER 2014 that: “Half of all children in Std V have not yet learned basic skills that they should have learned by Std II”; and “Close to half of all children will finish eight years of schooling but still not have learned basic skills in arithmetic”. [2]

As a result, the current pool of India’s labour force has very low employability mainly due to low productivity resulting from the poor quality of education.  If the labour productivity is low, then employers do not hire workers. And that is happening in India. India graduates more than five million graduates every year. Engineers comprise a small (but significant) part of it at around six hundred thousand, whereas the rest take up a variety of three or four year bachelor degree programs. The National Employability Report 2013   reveals that a significant proportion of graduates, nearly 47 per cent were found not employable in any sector, given their poor English language and cognitive/analytical skills. The report also indicates that only 17.4 per cent of technical graduates (engineers) in the country are ready to be employed. What this also means is that the rest, that is, 82.6 per cent, engineering graduates are unemployable. Again, their lack of English language knowledge and cognitive skills were identified as the major obstacles to their suitability in the job market. [3]

As such, various states have been complaining of a significant decline in learning outcomes. So they have been making RTE provision as a scapegoat and asking the Centre to revoke the provisions like no-fail policy. But such exam-obsessed approaches won’t improve learning outcomes.

There are many problems faced by India’s education system, as noted in my paper: “Education in India needs intensive care, not a quick fix”.[4]  The paper argues that the real solution lies in improving assessment and accountability systems, which largely translates into improving teacher recruitment and training.

From more than 90 per cent of aspirants failing the central Teacher’s Eligibility Test year after year to teacher absenteeism touching as high as 40 per cent in the poorest states to the prevalence of English teachers who just can’ not speak English, all around there are signs that teacher recruitment and training are in terrible shape in India. TOT Editorial rightly noted that “rather than obsessing over exams for students let’s focus on setting standards for teachers, having a system that rewards the good ones, and equipping teachers with modern pedagogical tools to teach critical thinking rather than rote lessons." [5] Only two things will truly de-stress students: good teachers and better opportunities after they graduate.

The similar views were expressed by The Economist, most trusted news magazine.  In its recent paper entitled: “How to make a good teacher”, the paper argued that forget smart uniforms and small classes to raise the standard of school teaching.  “The secret to stellar grades and thriving students is teachers”. The paper further emphasises that what matters in schools are teachers? Fortunately, teaching can be taught. [6] In sum, the idea of improving the average teacher could revolutionize the entire profession. If this is to change, teachers need to learn how to impart knowledge and prepare young minds to receive and retain it. And in the education reforms, this should be our priority.


The T.S.R. Subramanian committee, entrusted with preparing a new education policy for India submitted the report to the Government of India in May, 2016 suggesting measures that the country must take to improve the sector that caters to over 300 million students in the country. Among various measures to make good teachers, the report recommends that Teacher Entrance Tests (TET) should be made compulsory for recruitment of all teachers. The Centre and states should jointly lay down norms and standards for TET. [7] 

In addition to rational curricula and pedagogy as well as teachers’ training and teir selecti, we must explore how unconventional methods of teaching and learning could be used in improving the quality of education.  Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen in their book - The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business - sketch a future dominated by technology.[8] With vivid examples and brilliant analyses, they show how the internet and other communication technologies will empower individuals and transform the way nations and businesses operate. The authors  believe that “the most important pillar behind innovation and opportunity – education- will be tremendous positive change in the coming decades as rising connectivity reshape traditional routines and offer new paths for learning” (Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen,2013,21). According to the writers that in 2012, when the MIT Media Lab tested this digital technology in Ethiopia by distributing preloaded tablets to primary-age kids without accompanying teachers, the results were extraordinary: within months the kids were reciting the entire alphabet and writing complete sentences in English.

India's government-run schools are terrible, and education faces a drastic shortage of teachers across the board. If digital technology were deployed into education, the villages or remote areas with no access to schools suddenly become accessible. India has a satellite in orbit as well, which is meant to be used exclusively for education. Any institution can use it to impart education to children in remote areas.

For children in countries like India, the digital technology promises new access to educational tools, although clearly not as in developed world. And we must explore the implications of the burgeoning digital technology to improve the quality of education in India, because “physical class rooms will remain dilapidated; teachers will continue to take paychecks and not show up for class; and books and supply will be scare. But what’s  new in  this equation  - connectivity- promises that kids with access to mobile devices  and internet will be able to experience school physically and virtually, even if the latter is informal and on their own time”( Eric and Jared, 2013 22).

Father, there is urgent need to allocate mote funds to the education sector. The new education policy recommends that the outlay on education should be raised to at least 6 per cent of GDP without further loss of time. 

In sum, poor governance at school level and muddleheaded policies in higher education has hurt young people. To foster an environment of job creation, it is critical to produce employable Indians. This should be India’s motto. If India is to meet the more ambitious development goals in a challenging external environment, the post-2016 agenda needs to focus on ensuring a structural transformation of education system. That will enable labour to shift towards higher value-added sectors and more knowledge-intensive activities, thereby improving labour productivity relative to other developing countries. In other words, the government must focus on quality education, infrastructure rather than attempting to introduce controversial issues in the education system.




[1] Biao Idowu. 2010. Education, work and productivity in developing countries. Educational Research, Vol. 1(11) pp. 548-555.

[2] Refer Pratham’s 10th Annual Status of Education Report (ASER), 2014

[3] For details, see: The National Employability Report Graduates 2013 at: http://www.aspiringminds.in/docs/national_employability_study_IT_aspiringminds.pdf. Also see: The National Employability Report (NER) for Engineers by Aspiring Minds at: http://www.aspiringminds.com/research-articles/exploring-national-employability-report-engineers-2014-part-i .

[4] Kothari, Devendra. 2016. Education in India needs intensive care, not a quick fix, RAEA Policy Paper No. 6, PP. 1-18.

[6] Refer article: How to make a good teacher: What matters in schools are teachers? Fortunately, teaching can be taught, The Economist, June 11th, 2016.


[7] GoI. 2016. Some Inputs for Draft National Education Policy 2016, Ministry of Human Resource Development Government of India.

[8] Refer: Eric Schmidt  and Jared Cohen. 2013. The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business, Kindle Edition