Saturday, 28 February 2015

Delhi election verdict: Is it a wake up call for Modi?

Dr. Devendra Kothari
Population and Development Analyst
Forum for Population Action

It is critical for the Modi Government to draw the right lessons from the Delhi Assembly Election.

The Delhi Assembly Election verdict surprised everyone. It was not expected at all. Experts were hoping difference of five to eight seats between the winning and losing parities, but the verdict was quite shocking. By capturing 67 out of 70 seats in the Delhi polls, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has trumped not only Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) and Congress but pundits and pollsters as well. Nobody really anticipated the magnitude of what’s effectively a clean sweep. The remaining three seats went to BJP - the ruling party at the Centre, which won all the 7 Lok Sabha seats from this constituency some eight months ago.  Why this turned around?

AAP’s victory offers a clue to what India’s voters are thinking.  No doubt, Delhi’s electorate of 13.3 million is a tiny fraction of the total Indian electorate but it forms a microcosm of India. It has a huge migrant population from every corner of the country. As such, it is critical for the Modi government to draw the right lessons from the verdict, since the Delhi verdict has far greater significance in the Indian political landscape.

It is true that BJP got devastating defeat due to some wrong decisions especially bringing Kiran Bedi at the eleventh hour and projecting her as Chief Minister Candidate which annoyed local leaders, party members and RSS due to which sincere campaign and approach to voters was not done. But this does not explain the crushing defeat fully.

Modi won the 2014 Lok Sabha (Lower House) virtually on his own and delivered Maharashtra, Haryana and Jharkhand to BJP. But the Delhi voters did not find him relevant. Why? It is true that BJP got devastating defeat due to some wrong decisions especially bringing Kiran Bedi at the eleventh hour and projecting her as Chief Minister Candidate which annoyed local leaders, party members and RSS due to which sincere campaign and approach to voters was not done. But this does not explain the crushing defeat. 

I think it was a protest voting. The protest, disproval or negative voting is the same thing.  It allows many voters to express their formal disapproval of government working in a system where they all share some power. It is argued that “the negative voting occurs when voters respond more strongly to political actions or outcomes that they oppose them to comparable actions or outcomes they favor”. [1] 


Achhe din anne wale hain (Good days are coming) may have been an electoral idiom but it has placed a huge burden of expectations on the Modi government. New York Times has rightly concluded that “Modi has stirred excitement and raised expectations at home, by portraying himself as a confident can-do leader who will revitalize the economy, make the government function and lift millions out of poverty. So far there has been little concrete return and as the Delhi election suggested, people are growing frustrated”. In addition, while Modi’s monogrammed suit was seen as his ‘pro-rich’ bias, especially by the underclass, his silence on hate speeches by saffron hardliners had an unsettling effect on middle class voters.   In short, Delhi was lost due to protest or disapproval voting because in the last nine months BJP, despite its promises, did not implement measures to improve the day-to-day lives of people. And voters have hit back hard with a reminder that it is time to start delivering, not making promises: Perform or Perish.

The scale of the defeat of BJP in the Delhi polls is a wake-up call for the Modi Government. However, it is not a negative verdict on Modi’s development and reform agenda. Neither is it a reaffirmation of populist economic policies. People believe in his leadership. In fact, majority of Indians feel PM Modi is best hope for country as well as economy.  Experts feel that the Delhi verdict will steel Modi’s resolve to focus even more sharply on measures that will reignite investment and generate large-scale employment. Renowned journalist MJ Akbar concludes that “he is not going to be deflected by the short pass; he will absorb the stumble and restore the stride towards that horizon. [2] However, he has to reset his priorities.

Five months ago, PM Modi presented 'Make in India' as the centrepiece of his grand vision to achieve his poll slogan of "Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas" (together with all, development for all). Does this thrust will enable to achieve the motto? Will it help India prove its mettle? India has enjoyed high but vacillating economic growth in the post liberation period. But despite this, India is at the crossroad.  We have the largest number of hungry, malnourished and illiterate as well as under educated people in the world. Moreover, the current pool of labour force has very low employability. The National Employability Report revealed that among the six hundred thousand   engineers who graduated in 2011, only 17.4 per cent were employable. What this also means is that the rest, that is, 82.6 per cent, engineering graduates are unemployable. In addition, only half of total households have a source of water within the premises. This problem is further compounded by lack of access to sanitation. The Indian model of development has so far worked poorly in promoting inclusiveness.  It appears India has not given due recognition to the concept of equality in sharing the resources in its development agenda. Focusing only on ‘Make in India’ will further accentuate the gross inequalities. The Modi government has to acknowledge this, and initiate program, which focuses on inclusiveness alongside growth. 

In my recent post, it is argued that economic growth is not enough; it must be accompanied by structural transformation to unlock the human potential.[3] For this, a five-point agenda must be given due importance in the development planning of the country. And these are: first, reducing incidence of unwanted fertility or stabilizing population; second, ensuring quality education; third, improving physical living conditions; fourth, reducing gender gap; and lastly, shifting labour from rural to urban areas. This will help to build a more competitive workforce. 

No doubt, India is ready for double-digit growth in coming years, as noted by the Economic Survey 2015-15. However, to make it sustainable, the Modi Government has to focus not only on ‘Make in India’ but special attention has to be given to develop human capital. Speaking at a global renewable energy investment summit (Re-Invest 2015) in New Delhi, UN special envoy for cities and climate change Michael R Bloomberg said that most effective economic policies are ones that improve quality of life. India could see economic renaissance like China, but must invest in the development of human resources.






[1] Morris P Fiorina and Kenneth A Shepsle. 1989. Is negative voting an artifact?  American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 33(2) Pp 423-429.

[2] For details, refer post: How Delhi was lost by Rajiv Kumar, Senior Fellow at Centre for Policy Research at http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toi-edit-page/how-delhi-was-lost/.Also refer: Modi will absorb stumble, and regain his stride by MJ Akbar at http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/thesiegewithin/modi-will-absorb-stumble-and-regain-his-stride/

[3] For details, refer author’s post: Growth with structural transformation: A development agenda for India at: http://kotharionindia.blogspot.in/2015/01/growth-with-structural-transformation.html.



Saturday, 31 January 2015

Growth with structural transformation: A development agenda for India

Dr. Devendra Kothari
Population and Development Analyst
Forum for Population Action


For far too long, India has been a chronic under-achiever relative to potential. Economic growth is not enough; it must be accompanied by structural transformation to unlock the human potential.

Happy New Year to all!

Prime Minister Modi shared certain ‘dreams/visions' in 2014. 2015 is the year for deliverance of the same. No doubt, PM Modi is moving forward with his plans to put the stalled economy back into top gear. According to the latest report of the International Monetary Fund that   Asia's third-largest economy is showing signs of clawing out of sub-5 per cent growth recorded in the last two years, and that the raft of measures that the Modi government has announced has raised hopes that the government will be able to engineer a quick turnaround. The government has vowed to remove red tape and ease rules, and pledged a non-adversarial governance regime to push investors to make India a manufacturing hub through initiatives such as `Make in India’. Indeed, such relatively straightforward steps could make a powerful difference, raising the Indian growth rate by two or even three percentage points from its current 4-5% but will not create an environment for sustained economic growth, which is needed to solve all the problems of India. Also, for this, one needs a game plan, which should not be lost sight of.

India has enjoyed high but vacillating economic growth in the post-liberation period, although it is at a crossroads.  We have the largest number of hungry, malnourished, illiterate and under educated people in the world. Moreover, the current pool of labour force has very low employability. The National Employability Report 2013 [1] reveals that India generates more than five million graduates every year. A significant proportion of them, nearly 47%, were found not employable in any sector, given their poor English language and cognitive skills. The report also revealed that among the six hundred thousand   engineers who graduated in 2011, only 17.4 per cent were employable. What this also means is that the rest, that is, 82.6 per cent engineering graduates were unemployable.

These are facts the Indian elite/policy makers do not want to look at. ‘We just want to prove we have arrived at the world stage’. It appears that, 63 years of planned economy has not been able to resolve some basic issues, especially, those related to the development of human resources. The Human Development Index (HDI) is a summary measure of average achievement in key dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life, being knowledgeable and having a decent standard of living. It ranks countries in a descending order into four tiers of human development.[2] India’s rank in the Human Development Reports fell from 123rd in 2001 to 134th in 2011 and 135th in 2014 out of 187 countries  during the high economic growth period.
Understanding this “paradox" – high economic growth and low HDI values - is crucial to the development of a coherent post-2014 agenda. The paradox arises from the failure of India to achieve structural changes despite having grown vigorously as a result of liberalization economic policies since 1991. It is interesting to recall that in the early fifties the economy and living standard of people of China and India were almost at the same level; in fact, India was little bit ahead of China. China sidetracked other ‘non-important’ issues and concentrated on improving the quality of human resources and developing economy. Consequently, China is on the way to become a super power of the world. Its cities are shining and economy is booming. People are prosperous and relatively happy and their productivity is high (Table 1).

Table 1: A comparative statement – India and China
Indicator
India
China
1
2
3
Human Development Index, 2014 (Rank  and  Value)
135 (0.585)
91 (0.719)
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
10th
2nd
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in US$, 2013
1,499
(148)
6,807
(84)
% of Population living below International Poverty Line   ($1.25 per  day), 2009-11
33
13
% literates (age 15 and over  who can read and write), 2012
61
92
Life Expectancy at birth (in years) , 2010
64
74
Number of children per woman (TFR) 2010
2.7
1.6
Infant deaths/1000 births (IMR) 2010
51
18
Maternal deaths/100000 live births (MMR), 2013
190
32
Source: UN Population Division, and World Bank

Productivity, a measure of the efficiency of the human capital, can be measured by per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP). [3]  In their recent book, Beyond 2020: A Vision for Tomorrow's India, A.P.J Abdul Kalam and Y.S.Rajan analyzed this fact. [4]  They write: “The GDP per capita standings are the true indicators of how much India has been able to empower its citizens”. Table 2 makes it clear how much progress India needs to make to be on a par with Brazil, China and even Indonesia. India has become the tenth largest economy in the world in terms of GDP; however, has a very low per capita GDP. The country placed at the 148th position among the 187 countries, as per the World Bank. This is perhaps the most visible challenge. GDP per capita in India averaged 462.43 US$ from 1960 until 2013, reaching an all time high of 1499 US$ in 2013 and a record low of 228 US$ in 1960. Table 2 shows that China’s GDP per capita value in 2013 was more than four and half times that of India.

Table 2: Per capita GDP, selected Countries, 2013
Country
World Rank
GDP per capita (In US$)
1
2
3
Monaco
1
163,036
Norway
4
100,819
USA
13
53,143
Germany
22
45,085
Japan
28
38,492
South Korea
33
25,977
Russia
51
14,612
Brazil
65
11,208
China
84
6,807
S. Africa
89
6,618
Indonesia
119
3,475
Sri Lanka
124
3,280
Vietnam
137
1,911
India
148
1,499
Pakistan
152
1,299
Nepal
170
694
Somalia
189
150
World

10,472
Source:  World Bank National Account Data, 2013.

How to forge ahead:
So what need to be done to unlock India’s potential? In other words, what should be agenda for human development?  No doubt, putting the economy back on track and reducing inflation should be the government’s first priority. However, for sustainable development it is equally important to focus on human capital. Central to the human development approach is the concept of capabilities. Basic capabilities valued by virtually everyone include: good health, access to knowledge, and a decent material standard of living. The young demographic profile of the country also favors this agenda. Of all the Modi government’s popular initiatives in its first eight months in office are directed towards this end. Among these,   the Jan Dhan Yojana (the financial inclusion scheme); Swachh Bharat (the cleanliness drive); Digital India (promoting e-governance); Beti Bachao Beti Padhao (Save girl child, educate girl child); and Make in India (transforming India into the manufacturing hub) have caught the nation's imagination. All these will allow talent to grow. But we need a comprehensive agenda to raise human potential. In my opinion, the agenda should rest on five pillars: 

1. Reducing unwanted fertility: One has to recognize that population is an important factor in development, especially when it is growing seemingly out of control, since it leads to a significant diversion of national investable resources to consumption which could otherwise be used for increasing investment and productivity and for improving the quality of public social services, such as education, health, sanitation, provision of safe drinking water and for control of environmental degradation.


India’s population has grown from 846 million in 1991 to 1210 million in 2011- that is by 364 million  in the last  twenty years,  and is still growing by around 17 to 18 million every year. Current population growth is mainly fuelled by unwanted fertility.   More than four in ten pregnancies are unintended/unplanned or simply unwanted by the women who experience them and half or more of these pregnancies result in births that spur continued population growth.   Today 26.5 million babies are born each year and out of this about 6 million births could be classified as unwanted or unplanned. It is estimated that around 450 million people out of 1200 million in 2011 in India who were the result of unwanted pregnancies.[5] 

The consequences of unintended pregnancy are serious, slowing down the process of socio-economic development as well as process of change, and is being reflected in widespread hunger, poor health, poverty, illiteracy, unemployment,  regressing governance as well as increasing scarcity of basic resources like food, water and space despite concerted developmental efforts since 1991. And all these have adverse impact on the process of human development. So letting women have the means to manage their childbearing will help to make India a more stable and equal place. It is because when women (or couples)  have access to contraception appropriate to their needs, desires, and budgets, the potential benefits are many, including reduced maternal and child mortality as well as lesser number of abortions and unwanted pregnancies. In addition to its health benefits, family planning allows families and communities to invest more in education and health care and helps reduce poverty, as argued by the President of Population Council, Peter J. Donaldson.

Over the last few months, there has been a steady stream of outlandish statements advocating that every Hindu couple needed to produce four children (the number has now gone up to ten). What is the chance that these declarations of intent will get picked up and adopted by a significant number of Hindu women? In the last two decades, the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) that is the number of children that would be born to a woman has gone down from 4.5 children in 1991 to 2.4 in 2011, as per the Sample Registration System.  Similarly, the number of children per Hindu woman has gone down from 3.3 children in 1992-93 to 2.6 in 2005-06, as per the National Family Health Surveys. No doubt, Muslims have higher fertility than any other religious group.  The Hindu-Muslim fertility differentials, however, declined from 1.1 children per woman in 1992-93 (NFHS-1) to less than 0.5 children in 2005-06 (NFHS-3). It is interesting to note that the rate of decline in total fertility rate is faster among Muslims than Hindus. Looking to these facts, a question arises: How many families will take to active reproduction on a war footing to please their so-called religious/community leaders?

In the changed situation, most women, Hindu or Muslim, do not want more children. Around 20 million currently married women in the reproductive ages, mostly in poor performing States of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Utter Pradesh, seek to postpone childbearing, space births, or stop having children, but are not using a modern method of contraception. Often, these women travel far from their communities to reach a government health facility, only to return home “empty handed” due to shortages, stock outs, lack of choices and/or non-availability of doctors and paramedical staff. When women are thus turned away, they are unable to protect themselves from unintended/unplanned pregnancies or simply unwanted fertility.  
As such, a child by choice not by chance is the only way the poor can aspire to have a better life and good health: most important ingredients unlocking the human potential. For this, efforts should be intensified through greater access to suitable voluntary reproductive health services, information, education, and acceptable methods of family regulations.

2. Ensuring quality education: According to the latest Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2014, around half of our school students, after spending six years in school, cannot read basic sentences or perform simple arithmetic.  Unless education is rescued from the quagmire of mediocrity, all talk about realizing India’s demographic dividend will be without substance; and the country would be inching closer to socio-economic disaster. If India is to meet the more ambitious development goals in a more challenging external environment, the post-2014 agenda needs to focus on ensuring a structural transformation of education system. That will enable labour to shift towards higher value-added sectors and more knowledge-intensive activities, thereby improving labour productivity relative to other developing countries. It is argued that the enjoyment of the right to education could be enhanced if there is an acknowledgement of the problems that beset our educational system and if there is a willingness to solve such problems. [6]  In other words, the government must focus on quality education, infrastructure rather than attempting to introduce controversial issues in the education system.

3. Improving living conditions: Better living conditions are equally needed to create enabling environment for human development.  Only 47% of households have a source of water within the premises while 53% of households travel more than a kilometre in rural areas and more than 100 meters in urban areas to fetch their supplies, as per the findings of Census 2011. This problem is further compounded by lack of access to sanitation. About half of the total households in India still defecate in the open. This situation is particularly piquant for women and girls.  It is estimated that around 290 million women in India in 2011, the worst sufferers of open defecation, continue with the age-old practice even after 20 years of economic reforms.  Any improvement in access to toilet facilities, water, electricity and LPG is likely to result in a considerable reduction in domestic drudgery, especially for girls/women, freeing up their time for other activities including schooling and perusing professional life. We must focus on improving sanitation facilities in rural and urban areas.

4. Reducing gender gap: India is simply not doing enough for its women to improve access to resources and freedom of movement as well as improving decision-making power.  To deal with a problem that has roots in social behavior and prejudice, mere legislation is not enough. One has to create an environment where sons and daughters are equally valued.  For this, women must have access to education and training along with economic empowerment through property rights and paid employment opportunities. [7]

5. Shifting labour to urban areas: Since non-agricultural sectors will drive most of India’s future growth, this growth will mainly show up in the development of cities and towns. The level of urbanization in India, unlike the experience of several Asia’s miracle economies, has been quite low. It increased sluggishly from 17.3 per cent in 1951 to 31.2 per cent in 2011. As such, India has to invest heavily in manufacturing and service sectors, which will encourage farmers/rural people to move to more productive jobs in urban centres, especially to new or smaller cities. So far, India has encouraged rural people to stay home by subsidizing rural incomes through programs like NAREGA (National Rural Employment Guarantee Act) and Food Security Bill.

In short, foregoing discussion argues that India is trapped in a vicious circle of economic and human underdevelopment. Sustainable but inclusive economic progress depends on reversing this process in order to unleash an upward spiral of economic and human development by harnessing the synergies between the two. The main concern today is the impairment of human potential, which is not allowing India to reap its rich demographic dividend. It is high time that political parties focused on improving people’s ability to earn more rather than dolling out subsidies that make people dependent on the political class and system.  The above noted action areas are much effective interventions in creating an enabling environment, which allows talent to grow. This does not require much by way of resources; it needs reorientation of the priorities. Recently created NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India Aayog), a policy think-tank of the Government of India that replaces Planning Commission of India, may be asked to prepare a comprehensive approach aiming at overarching solutions to unlock human potential. To make India relevant again, the Modi government has no time to lose.



[2] The HDI combines three dimensions: A long and healthy life: Life expectancy at birth; Knowledge and education, as measured by the adult literacy rate; and a decent standard of living, as indicated by gross domestic product per capita at purchasing power parity.

[3] The measure is especially useful when comparing one country to another because it shows the relative performance of the countries. A rise in per capita GDP signals growth in the economy and tends to translate as an increase in productivity.

[4] A.P.J Abdul Kalam and Y.S.Rajan. 2014.  Beyond 2020: A Vision for Tomorrow's India, Viking, New Delhi. 


[5] Kothari, Devendra. 2014. “Managing Unwanted Fertility in India: Way Forward”, Institute of Economic Growth (ed.):   National Rural Health Mission: An Unfinished Agenda, New Delhi: Book Well, pp.25-36.  

[6] Kothari, Devendra. 2014. Education in India needs intensive care, not a quick fix, RAEA Policy Paper No. 1. Rajasthan Adult Education Association, Jaipur. 

[7] Kothari, Devendra. 2014. “Empowering women in India: Need for a Feminist Agenda”, Journal of Health Management, 16 (2), pp 233-43.